InvestingReviews: Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity - Is Fisher Investments Better Than Fidelity?

Reviews: Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity – Is Fisher Investments Better Than Fidelity?

This article provides a detailed comparison of Fidelity and Fisher Investments, tailored to help investors make an informed decision based on their individual needs and investment goals.

We are audience supported - when you make a purchase through our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Is Ficher Investments really different? Is Fisher investments better than Fidelity? Let’s compare Fisher Investments vs. Fideltiy and found out where both companies stand.

As a retired financial planner with over 25 years of experience, I have a unique perspective to offer readers who are interested in comparing Fisher Investments and Fidelity Investments. My expertise comes from working closely with numerous clients over the years who have held accounts at one or both prominent investment firms.

Choosing the right investment firm to manage your portfolio is one of the most important financial decisions you can make. But with so many options like Fisher Investments and Fidelity Investments, how do you decide which is best suited for your needs?

We will start with a brief overview of Fisher Investments, established in 1979, which focuses on high-net-worth investors and takes a global, long-term portfolio growth approach centered around opportunity capitalization and risk management.

Then we will examine the key facts on Fidelity Investments, founded in 1943, which serves over 40 million clients ranging from retail investors to institutions. Fidelity is known for its diverse investment products, retirement accounts, wealth management services, and its $4.2 trillion in assets under management.

So let’s dig in and comapre the two firms in more detail now.

Quick Answers: Comparing Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments

  1. For those pondering if Fisher Investments is better than Fidelity, the answer hinges on your individual financial needs and investment goals. Fisher excels in personalized portfolio management for high-net-worth clients, while Fidelity offers a broad range of investment products suitable for a diverse investor base. Delve deeper into this article to uncover the nuances that make each firm unique.
  2. Fisher Investments’ Strengths: Fisher’s approach is tailored, focusing on high-net-worth individuals with a minimum of $500,000 in investable assets. Their 100% equity model portfolios have shown impressive growth, particularly appealing to those with a high risk tolerance.
  3. Fidelity’s Diverse Offerings: Fidelity caters to a wider audience, from beginners to sophisticated traders, offering low-cost index funds, a variety of investment options, and automated digital advising. This makes it a go-to for investors seeking flexibility and a range of choices.
  4. Comparative Analysis: When comparing Fisher’s specialized services to Fidelity’s extensive product range, consider factors like investment strategies, risk management, and client resources. Each firm has its unique advantages depending on your investment style and objectives.

When deciding between Fisher Investments and Fidelity Investments, consider Fisher for personalized, high-net-worth portfolio management and Fidelity for a diverse range of accessible investment options. Your choice should align with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and the level of personalized service you require.

Comparison Table: Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments

CriteriaFisher InvestmentsFidelity Investments
Client FocusHigh-net-worth individualsBroad investor range
Minimum Investment$500,000No minimum
Service ModelPersonalized, high-touchDiverse, flexible options
StrengthsTailored equity portfolios, active managementWide range of products, low-cost funds
Ideal ForSubstantial asset holders seeking customizationInvestors seeking accessibility and variety
Risk ProfileHigher risk, active managementVaried, including low-risk options
FeesHigher, based on assets under managementLower, varies by account activity

Fisher Investments Review & Background

Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments
Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments

As one of the world’s largest independent investment advisers, Fisher Investments has over $197 billion in assets under management serving high-net-worth clients globally. Founded in 1979 by finance luminary Ken Fisher, Fisher Investments takes a personalized, tailored approach to portfolio management for investors with $500,000 or more in investable assets.

Fisher Investments assigns each client a dedicated Investment Counselor who takes the time to understand their specific financial situation, goals, timeline and risk tolerance. Counselors then construct customized portfolios typically comprised of domestic and foreign stocks, bonds, ETFs and other securities selected to align with the client’s needs.

At its core, Fisher Investments’ philosophy emphasizes consistent long-term growth through proactive management centered on opportunities and risk control. Their advisors actively monitor portfolios and market conditions, applying strategic adjustments to optimize returns while safeguarding capital through market fluctuations.

Background on Fidelity Investments

Tracing its origins to 1946, Fidelity Investments now serves over 40 million individual investors and 13,000 advisory firms managing over $11 trillion in total customer assets. In contrast to Fisher’s high-net-worth focus, Fidelity provides investment products and services spanning the spectrum for both retail and institutional investors.

For individual DIY investors, Fidelity offers an extensive suite of low-cost mutual funds and index funds, stocks, bonds, ETFs, retirement accounts like IRAs and 401(k)s. Sophisticated traders can utilize Fidelity’s trading platforms and wealth management resources. For those seeking a robo-advisor, Fidelity Go provides free online investment management for balances under $10k.

Timeline of the history of fidelity and fisher investments

Additionally, Fidelity provides financial planning, college savings accounts, cash management tools, and currency services to meet a diverse range of investor needs and experience levels. With extensive educational materials and customer support, Fidelity empowers clients to direct their own investment strategy or take a hands-off automated approach.

Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments: Is Fisher Investments Better Than Fidelity?

FactorFidelity InvestmentsFisher Investments
ClienteleAll investors – retail and institutionalHigh-net-worth investors (min $500k assets)
OfferingsExtensive – stocks, mutual funds, ETFs, IRAs, automated advisingFocused – customized multi-asset class portfolios
FeesVaries based on account activity, $0 minimums available1% annual % fee charged on assets under management
Client ResourcesDigital tools, research, education, branch network, call centersDedicated counselor for personalized guidance

Products and Services

Over my career, Fidelity’s vast array of investment options has appealed to novice investors just starting out as well as sophisticated traders managing complex portfolios. The convenience can’t be overstated – with a single Fidelity account, clients can trade stocks, invest in mutual funds, set up IRAs, Rollovers, access IPOs and more.

Comparing Fisher vs Fidelity

However, Fisher’s focused approach to bespoke portfolio management has resonated with ultra high net worth clients who want true customization. Fisher advisors take the time to construct individualized ETF, stock and bond mixes calibrated to growth goals and risk tolerance. For larger portfolios, personalization delivers but requires tradeoffs in investment selection.

Most clients under $5M have opted for Fidelity’s flexibility while those above often seek Fisher’s white-glove guidance in tailoring and managing strategy.

How Fisher Investments Compares to Fidelity Investments
How Fisher Investments Compares to Fidelity Investments

Fees and Minimums

A key advantage of Fidelity, especially for younger investors, has been easy access – no need for six figures to open an account. The firm has led the way in $0 minimum index funds and fractional share trading. Fees scale reasonably with account size.

By contrast, Fisher’s $500k threshold locks out many retail investors. And while the annual 1% AUM fee is competitive, it can equate to tens of thousands in recurring costs for larger balances.

But for the ultra high net worth crowd, particularly with over $10M, the custom level of service and access to institutional managers at Fisher outweighs the premium fees.

Fisher Investments Performance

Fisher manages over $155 billion for institutional and individual investors globally. Over the past decade, their 100% equity portfolio realized substantial growth of 206.12%. However, their fixed income options saw significantly lower 8.33% returns over the same period.

Though eye-popping equity returns may entice, prospective investors should weigh Fisher’s performance against appropriate benchmarks and risk-adjusted averages to gauge value.

Furthermore, alignment with individual risk appetite and goals remains vital – their equitable approach may not suit conservative retirees, while tenacious investors realized sizable gains holding Fisher’s concentrated stock mix long-term.

Investment services offered by Fisher investments

As with any money manager, Fisher’s metrics should be interpreted relative to client investment objectives and risk tolerance to determine fit.

Time in The Market Beats Timing The Market

Customer Support

Across 40+ million clients, Fidelity maintains top-tier phone and online support along with an extensive branch network for in-person assistance. While less personalized, scale enables robust always-on help accessible to all.

Meanwhile, Fisher assigns clients a dedicated advisor for tailored guidance. The experience can be transformational, however, smaller portfolios may not warrant close-contact stewardship.

In deciding, assess how much hand-holding you require. Self-starters tend to thrive with Fidelity’s digital tools while investors wanting an ongoing partnership benefit immensely from Fisher’s counselor model.

Ideal Customer Profile

With decades advising clients in choosing between Fidelity and Fisher, I’ve found aligning individual investor profiles and priorities with the strengths of each firm to be key in determining fit.

Fidelity Investments

  • Ideal For: Fidelity shines for its range of investment products catering to self-directed investors of all experience levels. Those wanting to manage their own stocks/funds alongside a Robo-advisor benefit. The accessibility further suits younger investors focused on saving for retirement.
  • Accessibility: By leading the way with $0 minimum index funds and fractional stocks, Fidelity uniquely welcomes novice investors ready to get started regardless of initial assets. Ongoing fees also remain competitive for leaner portfolios.

Fisher Investments Investment Philosphy

Fisher Investments Investment Philosphy
  • Ideal For: The bespoke counselor guidance and tailored portfolio construction approach most benefits high-net-worth investors who want hands-on strategy customization and access to institutional managers. Those with complex assets or unique objectives thrive with Fisher’s concierge-style stewardship.
  • Minimum Balance: The $500k minimum asset threshold along with steeper account fees cater specifically to the ultra-high-net-worth crowd, with optimization and specialization for larger portfolios over $5M-$10M+ in assets.

In advising clients, assessing hands-on involvement, growth vs stability objectives, and current wealth levels have proven most indicative for determining suitability between the distinguished firms.

Remaining Questions

Key considerations for investors still evaluating Fisher vs Fidelity:

  • Past Performance – how have returns compared between the two, especially during market volatility?
  • Investment Strategies – what are each firm’s approaches to sectors like tech, alternatives, options, and risks like inflation?
  • User Experience – do service levels differ working with $100k vs $5M+ portfolios?
  • New Investor Onboarding – how difficult is the process to open and fund new accounts?

Alternative Firms to Consider for Portfolio Management

Fisher Investments offers many benefits but may not be the ideal choice for all investors. Here are a few leading alternatives to consider for portfolio management:

  • Vanguard – Well regarded for its low-cost index funds and ETFs. Caters to long-term, passive investors.
  • Fidelity – Offers a robust platform with automated advising options. Great for casual investors or those with low account minimums.
  • Charles Schwab – Provides a wide array of investment products and services. Better for investors who want some guidance from advisors.
  • Betterment – Top robo-advisor with automated portfolio management and low account minimums. Perfect for hands-off investors.

How Fisher Compares to Other Major Firms

Now that we’ve covered Fisher Investments’ offerings, how do they stack up against some other prominent investment firms? Here’s a quick overview:

  • Fisher – Personalized advice, $500k minimum, tailored portfolios, higher fees but high-touch service
  • Vanguard – Passive investing approach with index funds/ETFs, extremely low fees
  • Fidelity – Broad selection of investment products, robust digital platforms, low fees
  • Schwab – Full-service firm, wide array of financial services alongside investment management
  • TD Ameritrade – Focus on self-directed trading platform, large pool of investment choices

Fisher caters to those wanting dedicated guidance for substantial portfolios. The other firms serve varied needs – from passive investors to traders to comprehensive financial services.

Next Steps: Fidelity Vs. Fisher Investmetns – Which Firm is Right for You?

When deciding between Fisher Investments and Fidelity Investments, consider Fisher for personalized, high-net-worth portfolio management and Fidelity for a diverse range of accessible investment options. Your choice should align with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and the level of personalized service you require.

Comparison Table: Fisher Investments vs. Fidelity Investments

CriteriaFisher InvestmentsFidelity Investments
Client FocusHigh-net-worth individualsBroad investor range
Minimum Investment$500,000No minimum
Service ModelPersonalized, high-touchDiverse, flexible options
StrengthsTailored equity portfolios, active managementWide range of products, low-cost funds
Ideal ForSubstantial asset holders seeking customizationInvestors seeking accessibility and variety
Risk ProfileHigher risk, active managementVaried, including low-risk options
FeesHigher, based on assets under managementLower, varies by account activity
Subscription Form (#3)
  • Sharing the article with your friends on social media – and like and follow us there as well.
  • Sign up for the FREE personal finance newsletter, and never miss anything again.
  • Take a look around the site for other articles that you may enjoy.

Note: The content provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial or legal advice. Consult with a professional advisor or accountant for personalized guidance.

Michael Ryan
Michael Ryanhttps://michaelryanmoney.com/
Who Am I? I'm Michael Ryan, a retired financial planner turned personal financial coach. And author and found of blog. My advice is backed by decades of hands-on experience in finance and recognition in esteemed publications like US News & World Report, Business Insider, and Yahoo Finance. 'here'. Find answers to your financial questions, from budgeting to investing and retirement planning, on my blog michaelryanmoney.com. My mission is to democratize financial literacy for all.